Compare / Evander vs. Greenhouse

Evander vs. Greenhouse

Greenhouse defined structured hiring for a generation of companies. Here is how it compares with an AI-native ATS built for teams that move fast.

Updated November 11, 20267 min read

At a glance

The short version, then the details below.

Choose Greenhouse ifyou are a mid-size or large company that needs structured hiring at scale, a huge integration ecosystem and enterprise procurement.
Choose Evander ifyou are a startup or lean team that wants to be live today, wants AI to screen every applicant, and wants transparent pricing.
GreenhouseEvander
Best forMid-size and enterprise companies running structured hiringStartups and fast-moving teams
PriceQuote only. Third-party buyer data puts the average contract around $27,000/yearFree plan, then $79–299/month (billed yearly) for teams up to 100. Unlimited jobs and teammates.
Free planNoYes, forever
SetupSales process; buyers report implementation and training as extra costsSelf-serve, minutes
AIReal Talent (matching, fraud detection), AI interview notes, role setupEvery applicant screened against your brief, one-sentence job posts, plain-English automations
Claude / ChatGPTOfficial MCP server, announced May 2026 and rolling out to customers from June 2026Official MCP server: every action in the app is a tool
Structured hiringIndustry standard: interview plans and scorecardsStages and scorecards generated per role; scorecards optional
IntegrationsVery large partner marketplaceGmail, Google Calendar, Slack, WhatsApp alerts, CSV, XML job feed, MCP

Where Greenhouse is strong

Greenhouse popularized structured hiring: interview plans, scorecards and consistent evaluation across every candidate. Its partner marketplace is one of the largest in recruiting, and it is built for companies with recruiting teams, approval chains and procurement requirements.

It has also moved quickly on AI. Real Talent adds candidate matching and fraud detection, and in May 2026 Greenhouse announced an official MCP server, rolling out to customers from June, so admins can connect Claude, ChatGPT and other assistants under existing permissions.

Where Evander works differently

Built for teams without a recruiting department

Greenhouse assumes a recruiting team runs the process. Evander assumes founders and hiring managers do it between everything else. Jobs go live from one sentence, every applicant is screened against your brief with the evidence shown, and follow-ups run as plain-English automations.

Live today, not next quarter

There is no sales call or implementation project. Sign up, connect Gmail and Calendar, describe your first role. Your pipeline starts filling itself from your inbox the same day.

Scorecards when you want them

Evander generates stages and a scorecard per role, but does not nag. For a ten-person company, a fast, well-documented decision usually beats a mandatory form.

AI as the core, not a module

Screening, job drafting, interview prep and automations all run on the same AI layer, and every action is also an MCP tool. Ask your assistant who is stuck in the pipeline and it answers from live data.

Pricing

Greenhouse does not publish prices. Third-party buyer data puts a typical contract around $27,000 per year: Vendr reports an average of about $27,000 and CostBench a median of $26,646. Much smaller and much larger contracts are both reported. Buyers also report implementation, training and add-ons on top.

Evander publishes every price: free for your first hire, then $79–299 a month billed yearly for teams up to 100 people, and from $449 a month for 101–500. Unlimited jobs and teammates on every plan.

Switching from Greenhouse

  • Export candidates and jobs as CSV and import them into Evander.
  • Recreate your interview stages in one sentence per role, or let Evander generate them.
  • Connect Gmail and Calendar so ongoing threads and interviews are matched automatically.

The verdict

For a large organization with a recruiting team and complex compliance needs, Greenhouse is a proven, deep platform. For a startup or lean team that wants AI to take the work off its plate and pricing it can read on a website, Evander is the faster and cheaper path.

Looking at other options too? See Greenhouse alternatives compared.

Questions

How much does Greenhouse cost?

Not published (plans Core, Plus, Pro). Third-party buyer data: about $27,000 a year on average (Vendr), median $26,646 (CostBench).

Does Greenhouse have a free plan?

No. Evander has a free plan with unlimited jobs and teammates and 50 AI resume scorings a month.

Does Greenhouse have an MCP server for Claude and ChatGPT?

Yes; announced May 7, 2026, rolling out to customers from June 2026 (plans not stated). Evander: Yes. Every action in the app is a tool; sensitive actions wait for a person's approval.

Sources: Greenhouse does not publish prices; figures are third-party estimates (Vendr and CostBench). Greenhouse MCP from its announcement of May 7, 2026, re-read on November 12, 2026; Real Talent from Greenhouse's 2026 announcements. Checked on November 11, 2026. Greenhouse is a trademark of its owner; this page is not affiliated with or endorsed by Greenhouse. Spotted something out of date? Write to hello@getevander.app.

Hiring that runs itself.
Start with the free plan.

Enter invite code

Access is by invite only.